The framework for the governance of ‘Scheduled Areas introduced in 1935: Those regions inhabited predominantly by Adivasis (India’s Indigenous and ‘tribal’ peoples)

Abstract | To read the full paper (pp. 46), click here >>

The Government of India Act was formalized in 1935 as a means of transferring administrative power from the British Raj to the Indian National Congress. It introduced a new framework for the governance of ‘Scheduled Areas,’ i.e. those regions inhabited predominantly by Adivasis (literally ‘original inhabitants’), or India’s Indigenous and ‘tribal’ peoples, such as ‘the Mundas.’ Codifying the histories of these areas according to their occupation by Adivasi societies, the Act prompted contemporary anthropological research that questioned colonial categories of racial difference. Contingent and regionally nuanced concepts emerged, such as ‘racial’ minorities, Adivasi rights, and social solidarity that refocused public and administrative attention on Adivasi history and heritage. These concepts are easily forgotten in polarized debates on the workings of assimilationist vs. protectionist ideologies in respect of Adivasi peoples and lands. Yet such shifts prompted a revision of wider temporal and cultural relations between majority (mainstream) and minority (tribal) communities. The paper [“Anthropological Archives …”] aims to explore such interfaces through the metaphor of the archive and the prospect of ‘holism’, and with close reference to the medium of portraiture. In particular, images of Birsa Munda – an Adivasi freedom-fighter from the Ranchi district of Jharkhand – are foregrounded as a means to interpret the emergent relationship of Indian anthropology to ‘the Mundas’ and to ‘the nation.’ Signified in different ways by Birsa Munda, his followers, and those interested in making the posthumous prophet-rebel visible again within the political and cultural parameters of modern India, these relations became acquired dynamism through their temporal complexity and embodiment.

Source: Abstract: ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHIVES AND ‘CHIASMIC’ TIME IN MODERN INDIA BY DANIEL RYCROFT
URL: https://anthropologyireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IJA_19_2_2016.pdf
Date visited: 4 April 2020

[Bold typeface added above for emphasis]

Learn more about

• Archery
• Birsa Munda
• Chhattisgarh
• Childhood and children
• Chotanagpur
• Colonial policies
• Customs
• Games and leisure time
• History
• Martial arts
• Munda
• Success Story
• Santal Hul
• Video | Hul Sengel: The Spirit of the Santal Revolution (1855) – Jharkhand

Dr Rycroft is Lecturer in the Arts and Cultures of Asia at the School of World Art Studies, UEA. He specialises in South Asian art and anthropological history. He took up this post in 2006, and has since co-founded the journal World Art. He works on numerous individual and collaborative research projects. Previously Dr Rycroft held a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship, focusing on ‘Subalternity and Visual Representation in India’ at the University of Sussex from 2003-2005. He was then also a Senior Research Associate of the Centre for World Environmental History, and organized a conference there on ‘Reinterpreting Adivasi Movements in South Asia’ in March 2005. Since joining the School of World Art Studies Dr Rycroft has been awarded a Teaching Fellowship to develop an image archive covering core aspects of South Asian art. He is currently Director of Postgraduate Taught Programmes. He also convenes the MA programmes in Cultural Heritage and facilitates a research network on Indian anthropology. He is an editorial board member of Art History, and co-founder of the South Asian Arts Group.

Source: Biography https://people.uea.ac.uk/d_rycroft

More by and about Daniel Rycroft >>

Related posts

• Accountability | Adverse inclusion | Assimilation | Land rights | Rural poverty
• Boarding school | Education | Residential school | Tribal elders
• Colonial policies | History | Hul (Santal rebellion 1855-1856) | Tribal history covered in “India After Gandhi” by Ramachandra Guha
• Community facilities | Government of India | Networking | Organizations
• Continents, countries & regions: Africa | America & National Museum of the American Indian | Australia | Canada | Japan | New Zealand | Scandinavia | Tribal culture worldwide
• Customs | De- and re-tribalization | Globalization | Media portrayal | Misconceptions | Modernity | Particularly vulnerable tribal group
• Democracy| Constitution and Supreme Court | Jawaharlal Nehru’s “five principles” for the policy to be pursued vis-a-vis the tribals
• Eco tourism | Nature and wildlife | Tourism
• Environmental history and what makes for a civilization – Romila Thapar
• Forest Rights Act (FRA) | Vanavasi
• Forest dwellers in early India – myths and ecology in historical perspective
• Hyderabad biodiversity pledge
• People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI)
• Revival of traditions
• Storytelling | Success story | Videovolunteers
• United Nations Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Towards “a life free from want and fear” for every ethnic group – United Nations
• “Who are Scheduled Tribes?”: Clarifications by the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes – Government of India